Where every wallet landed
Most results are small either way: two thirds of wallets lost less than $1,000, and another fifth made less than $1,000. The 2,608 wallets that made more than $100K took $2.28B between them.
A few hundred wallets hold most of the money
Of the $2.64B won, 63% went to the 425 wallets that made more than $1M each. Losses are almost as concentrated: 415 wallets lost 55% of the $2.80B that went the other way.
Bigger traders are profitable more often
The share of profitable wallets climbs from one in four among those that traded under $10K to nearly half among those that traded over $100M. Big traders win bigger, but lose bigger too — the median wallet still finished slightly down in every tier.
Show as a table
Stock traders have done better than crypto traders
Comparing wallets that put at least 80% of their buying into one kind of market. At every size above $10K, wallets trading stock, commodity and index perps were profitable more often — 57% versus 40% among the largest.
Find the wallets that win
AlphaHunter screens millions of on-chain traders by realized PnL, win rate and holding time, so you can study and follow the few who are consistently ahead.
Get StartedWhat's counted. Perpetual futures only: realized profit after fees, plus funding paid or received, plus open positions valued at the last trade on Sep 18, 2026. Spot trading is excluded. Only wallets that traded perps in the window are included.
What isn't. The data starts Feb 1, 2026, so a wallet that was already trading before then is judged only on what happened inside the window. Stock traders' better record covers one stretch of 2026 and may not hold in other markets. Nothing here is financial advice.
Source: Hyperliquid node fill and funding data, analysed by AlphaHunter.